Report to President on Gun Control Legislation

Report to electric chair on Gun Control LegislationAccording to the second amendment of the U.S. Constitution, it has been guaranteed to the people, a right to keep and affirm arms and such rights shall non be infringed. The result is that generally thither is a heated hand regarding the weapon- tick rule. While in that location atomic number 18 many who want to increase the regulation of firearms, many people mark such regulation. For example, the article appearing in USA Today, titles as Next, Comprehensive Reform of Gun Laws the psychiatric hospital of strict gun- direct commandment by the Senate has been applauded and the benefits that feces be derived by such reform legislation as well as the need for more than such truths has been highlighted (USA Today 475). but, the detrimental effect of gun throw legislation has as well been equally highlighted in the media and likewise the way such legislation has an op spot on the crime rate as well as the safety of the citizens (Gottlieb). In the present report, the arguments made by both sides gestate been evaluated and an attempt has been made to provide a critical assessment of the need for gun-control legislation.As menti cardinald above, the somebodys who are in favor of the introduction of more gun-control laws claim that the laws that require waiting period as well as the background check of the persons who are ordaining to hold firearms can help in keeping these firearms away from the reach of criminals. The premise behind this argument shows that the laws that impose a ban on certain types of guns and ammunitions will result in keeping the streets safer because these weapons will not be available to easily. In this way, it is implied that such laws will prevent the criminals from accessing guns and it will also discourage the use of highly dangerous anti-personnel weapons. At the akin time, this argument also believes that with the introduction of more such laws, the judicial system wi ll also be in a better position to process the crimes related with guns and at the same time, it will discipline licensing and training for the owners of these guns. thitherfore, it can be implied that more such laws should be enacted because it will allow the good system to work more efficiently and ensure the basic regulatory policies.However there are many who do not agree with this argument. According to these persons, it has been amply supported by statistics that in episode of the States where gun control laws have been passed that require waiting period for purchasing guns, the rate of crime has in fact increased. This data is very earthshaking because every time new gun-control legislation is introduced, the rate of risky crime increases instead of going trim back. Therefore, the opponents of gun control legislation argue that nobody wants an increase in violent crime. Moreover, it is also pointed out that as a result of the gun-control legislation, the streets have be come safer for the criminals only tour the danger for the victims increase because the victims are not in a position to treasure themselves. It is also argued in this regard that it is the fundamental right of a person to protect himself and his family. Keeping in mind the meaning of this right, it can be argued that more gun-control legislation should not be introduced in America.However, it needs to be celebrated in this regard that the introduction of more gun control legislation can be considered as the most significant step that can be taken in order to bring down firearm related crime. By imposing such laws that require waitlist, training, registration and a ban on dangerous weapons, it can be expected that the cities will become safer. The objections raised by the opponents of gun control legislation appeared to be insufficient due to the reason that they rely on the statistical evidence and there is ceaselessly a chance that such evidence may not be accurate. At the same time, this argument is also basebornd on the assertion that there is always a chance that the sale of guns in sick market will increase. However the basis of the belief of the supporters of gun control legislation lies in disarming the criminals and making it difficult for the criminals to purchase guns. While the death of a victim is always unfortunate however the blame cannot be placed on gun-control legislation. The purpose of such legislation is to protect the victims. Although it is a way to protect oneself and the family to purchase a gun but it is not the only way. There are several other solutions available instead of using lethal force and the solutions are overmuch more effective.Moreover, statistical data is often used by the opponents of gun control legislation in their support. However, it appears to be highly improbable that the increase in rates of crime is somehow related with firearms waitlist. If gun-control laws were not there, it will be very easy for everyo ne to have a gun, even if such person was a criminal record. However with the help of gun control legislation, the number of guns that are present on the streets can be reduced. If the number of guns present industries is reduced, the sale of guns in the black market will also decrease.It cannot be denied that it is the main righteousness of the government and protect the fundamental rights of the citizens but at the same time, it is also the responsibility of the government to introduce new laws so that the safety and well-being of the citizens can be ensured. The same is unbowed in case of the area of gun control. The citizens are significantly impacted by the laws that are machine-accessible by the government in this regard and it is hoped that the laws will work in the best interests of the citizens. As a result, the citizens are at the core of the issue or the social side of this debate. As the laws in the state are enacted through the vote of the people, as a result, the s ociety plays a significant role in the debate related with gun-control. The question that is generally asked in this debate is if owning the guns can be considered as a significant social reason behind the rate of homicide and suicide in America. This question lies at the base of the debate going on regarding gun control and at the same time, it also provides a significant reason behind the impersonation of gun control legislation.Apart from taking the guns away from the common citizens, we reviewed to ensure their safety, there is another reason behind the enactment of gun control legislation. This reason is to prevent the guns from orbit the hands of criminals. But generally, the criminals do not face any barriers in acquiring deadly firearms although there are several laws that prevent the ownership of these weapons. There are certain laws that prohibit that any person was being accused or convicted of a deadly crime which carries a sentence of more than one year is prevented f rom possessing a gun. However, these laws have not proved to be very effective.It needs to be say in this regard that the debate related with gun-control has three aspects, social, political and criminal. There is a significant kind between the three. For example the criminal aspect of gun control has resulted in considerable social strife and as a result, political action has to be taken. The combined effect of these three aspects working conjointly is to promote or prevent the introduction of gun control legislation as these laws significantly impact each and every person, regardless of the position taken by such a person (Cavett). due(p) to the fact that a large number of groups are involved in the issue of gun control, it is likely that the debate that is going on in this case is not going to fade very soon. However it is almost certain that significant changes have to be introduced in the present policy related with the stubbornness of firearms. Some of the questions that can be asked in this regard is if the gun-control legislation is going to help or mischief the citizens to which they are trying to protect. Similarly another question that can be asked in this regard is if the enactment of these laws take away any of the fundamental rights enjoyed by the citizens. All these questions have to be considered carefully objet dart dealing with this question.A much has been suffered by the nation at the hands of the dangerous people who have used terms in order to comment various acts of violence. Although most of the gun owners are law abiding and responsible and guns are used by them safely (Lund 127). However, the issue of gun control is a very complex issue. Therefore it becomes important that well founded, truthful statistics as well as scientific research is used to deal with the issue and find the basic causes behind the misuse of our arms and also crimes that are committed with the help of guns (Nocera). It will be very helpful for society if the general frequent as well as the main source of information of the public, media, adopts a critical skepticism and a responsible approach towards the claims made by the parties on both sides of this debate.In the end, it can be state that after considering the arguments forwarded by both sides regarding the issue of gun control, and examining the stands and weaknesses of the arguments from both sides in order to deeply decompose the competing views, it appears that the arguments in favor of the introduction of more gun-control legislation are in a better position as compared to the arguments that are given against the introduction of such legislation (Berzon). The arguments made by the supporters of gun control legislation have been significantly successful in explaining the benefits that can be provided by the introduction of more gun-control laws (Cullen). At the same time, the supporters of gun control legislation also provides solutions and the solutions are delivered clear ly and concisely (Whitehead 13). On the other hand, the opponents of gun control legislation generally rely too heavily on unbacked statistics. In the absence of supportive evidence, it can be believed that the arguments made by the opponents of gun control legislation do not hold much weight. At the same time, the assumption that is generally made by the opponents of such laws that the introduction of these laws will result in an increase in the sale of guns in black market is also not supported by facts. However, both the opponents as well as the supporters of gun control legislation want to protect the lives of innocent citizens and reduce the crime rate. However the solution lies in the introduction of more gun-control legislation.